Despite not being an American
citizen and therefore not a militant of any political party in the United
States, I systematically conduct a study of the daily occurrences in this
country, and try to interpret
the dynamics of the society in which I live today.
the dynamics of the society in which I live today.
My moral duty, as payment to
the nation that gives me shelter, is to draw your attention to the dangers that
weigh on its surroundings and that are consolidated in the social consciousness
at a certain alarming degree, and in an immutable fashion.
Precisely, when assessing the
process that led Barack Obama to the White House, his subsequent exercise of
power, his handling of foreign policy and the overturning of the youth toward a
left radical political ideology, there is no doubt that a rapid disintegration
of the foundations that gave rise to this nation is taking place.
The joy that no man with a
lefty tendency in the world by the way the United States has conducted itself
during the past eight years can somehow serve to understand how American
democratic pillars are deteriorating. There is no justification to change the image
of America in the world; making concessions of principles and kneeling itself
before those who want to put this country on its knees.
This process has been
advancing for many years. As an example, a young Cuban professional living in
Madrid came to Washington, DC, to hold some political meetings that would help
him promote an agenda of solidarity in favor of those Africans discriminated
against in Spain. He was welcomed to town by leaders of the Capitol and ended
up drinking Havana Club and Mojitos in the former Cuban Interests Section in
the capital city. He later spoke of the presence of the "crème de la
crème" at such meetings, representing an extensive network of
non-governmental organizations operating in the country. They seized the opportunity
to congratulate themselves on the change of president in the White House, and
the progress of the left in Latin America.
The example illustrates how
vulnerable the country is to an ideological poison from the outside (already
in) and to a harassment of its most important democratic institutions.
There is a possibility that
Hillary Clinton could become a president; if so she will continue to make
sustainable the "carrot and stick" policy to give continuity to a
project that remains hidden in the minds of American liberals. It is connected,
I think, with the rebirth of the country to accommodate it as a social
extension that would endanger the freedoms, property, prosperity and the
ingenuity of the American people.
All this justifies the five
reasons to consider in order to prevent Hillary Clinton from becoming the next
American president.
First reason: It would weaken
the global leadership of the United States as it is happening today.
This is not to impose the
United States as a global police force, nor that the world would depend on
America to solve the problems of certain nations, but this nation must show its
power where human rights are violated or where alliances are created with the
aim to destroy the American society. One must remember the abominable crime
that took place during the genocide in Rwanda where the administration of
President Bill Clinton looked the other way and within one hundred days over
eight hundred thousand people were massacred by the barbarism of racial hatred.
The victims of that conflict are still wondering where the Americans were.
Second Reason: The Gramsci
effect will gain strength in the country.
Possibly, the vast majority
of Americans do not know who Antonio Gramsci was because the academia world
ignores him. However, this Italian politician is the father and ideological
support of the changes that are taking place in Latin America. The impact of
his ideas is gaining momentum in the United States within the youth, the media,
the education sector and critical intellectuals against the system, although
some are unaware of the ideological reason of his political motivations.
Gramsci invites to take political power without violence. He proposes to win
and consolidate a small space and then move to another level and to add it to
the previous one until reaching geographic, political, economic and moral
space. Already, independent Senator
Bernie Sanders, calls himself a socialist, has broken the barrier of fear by
mentioning that word in this country. Who doubts that in the silence of complicity
there are other Democratic politicians who think like him?
Third reason: The size of
government will grow to justify its liberal ideology.
Democrats have been
characterized by large governments. This extension will continue to increase
with a Democratic president because it serves as a platform to promote their
liberal doctrine generating unimaginable public spending. The left is militant
in nature and its political action is permanent. The argument will be the same
as usual, "we want to change things for the good of the majority, but we
are faced with a Republican opposition." When the failures of a democratic
administration are blamed on an active element of the opposition, one is trying
to legitimize the actions of the government as just in order to win
unconditional supporters.
Fourth reason: An ideological
war against the Republicans will be triggered to show that the US government is
a democratic alternative.
The American political
spectrum has never been as polarized as it is at the present moment. With a
Democratic president in the White House, tension and convulsion will increase
toward the Republican opposition. The purpose is to believe in, the popular
belief of the entire nation, the idea that the fate of the country should be in
Democratic hands. It is here where the greatest danger, before an
unquestionable ideological maneuver that presupposes to demonize the political
opposition to gain an advantage, lies.
Fifth reason: Victimization
generates a welfare state
Apathy towards work is a growing
trend for an important sector of the American people. However, the offering of
free goods and services, which generates laziness and social immobility, are
part of the populist programs that Democrats promote.
To be supportive and
compassionate is ethical, but when the state assumes the basic support of
citizens effortlessly something is wrong. A Democratic administration will not
correct these policies; on the contrary, it will promote social projects that
support idleness to gravitate to toward the increasing number of the poor.
Warnings do not always
rationalize the conscience of the people. Modern life, with its immediacy,
individualizes …… all because generally
people focus on what may make a profit. Some politicians in the US are marginalizing
the convening power, and breaking with the traditional model, a growing number
of discontented citizens who by word of mouth are imposing the irrational
message of the left.
The next few years will
define the American destiny. With Democrats ruling, that destiny may be
uncertain. With a Republican president, America will rise from the ashes to
which its internal opponents want to convert.
No comments:
Post a Comment